Register Now

Faculty

Guest Faculty

L. Michael Brunt, MD
Professor of Surgery
Chief, Section of Minimally Invasive Surgery
Director, MIS Fellowship
Director, Washington University Institute For Minimally Invasive Surgery
Washington University School of Medicine

Committee

Allan Okrainec, MD
David Urbach, MD
John Hagen, MD
Timothy Jackson, MD

Local Faculty

* University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery

  • Shady Ashamalla, MD, FRCSC*
  • Claude Burul, MD, FRCSC*
  • Sean Cleary, MD, FRCSC*
  • Stan Feinberg, MD, FRCSC*
  • John Hagen, MD, FRCSC*
  • Keith Jarvi, MD, FRCSC*
  • Laz Klein, MD, FRCSC*
  • Paul Kortan, MD, FRCSC*
  • Steve MacLellan, MD, FRCSC*
  • Allan Okrainec, MD, FRCSC*
  • Fayez Quereshy, MD, FRCSC*
  • Ori Rotstein, MD, FRCSC*
  • Eran Shlomovitz, MD, FRCSC*
  • Peter Stotland, MD, FRCSC*
  • Carol Swallow, MD, FRCSC*
  • Jensen Tan, MD, FRCSC*
  • David Urbach, MD, FRCSC*

Faculty Disclosure

It is the policy of University of Toronto, Faculty of Medicine, Continuing Professional Development to ensure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its individually accredited or jointly accredited educational programs. Speakers and/or planning committee members, participating in University of Toronto accredited programs, are expected to disclose to the program audience any real or apparent conflict(s) of interest that may have a direct bearing on the subject matter of the continuing education program. This pertains to relationships within the last FIVE (5) years with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or other corporations whose products or services are related to the subject matter of the presentation topic. The intent of this policy is not to prevent a speaker with a potential conflict of interest from making a presentation. It is merely intended that any potential conflict should be identified openly so that the listeners may form their own judgments about the presentation with the full disclosure of facts. It remains for the audience to determine whether the speaker's outside interests may reflect a possible bias in either the exposition or the conclusions presented.